Evaluation of the Implementation of Cross Interest Physics Subject for Non-Mathematics and Natural Sciences Students at Senior High School

Vivin Khoiri Yanti(1), Suliyanah Suliyanah(2), Nur Shabrina Safitri(3), Utama Alan Deta(4),

DOI: https://doi.org/10.46843/jiecr.v2i1.22


(1) Universitas Negeri Surabaya, Indonesia
(2) Universitas Negeri Surabaya, Indonesia
(3) Central China Normal University, China
(4) Universitas Negeri Surabaya, Indonesia

Abstract

Cross-interest is a program that aims to expand and develop students' interests, talents and abilities by selecting subjects outside the specialization program group. The cross-interest program has been implemented for several years in Indonesia, but there is still very little evaluation of the implementation of this program, especially across physics interests. For the implementation of cross-interest physics to be more optimal, research related to cross-interest program evaluation in physics is needed. This study aims to evaluate cross-interest programs in physics and identify obstacles in its implementation hence the solutions can be formulated. This study involved 203 social science students as respondents from schools which implementing cross-interest physics programs. This type of research uses evaluative research with qualitative descriptive methods, where data collection is compiled using questionnaires and interviews which are conducted online. The results of this study indicate that there are still several obstacles in the implementation of cross-interest classes in physics, including the inadequacy of class grouping across interests with student interests, lack of teacher teaching hours, and lack of participation and enthusiasm of cross-interest class students compared to specialization class students. Based on the research results, it can be concluded that the implementation of the cross-interest program in physics is still below expectation. Through the results of this research, it is presented an evaluation material and become a consideration for the relevant parties in charge of implementing the cross-interest physics program subsequently there will be improvements in the implementation of cross-interest physics program purposefully.

Keywords

interests; cross interests; evaluation; implementation

Full Text:

PDF

References

Christianto, H., Silaban, R., Verawaty, M., & Nurwahyuningsih. (2016). Analisis Pembelajaran Lintas Minat Kimia di Kelas X Dan XI IIS SMAK Bintang Laut Bagansiapi-siapi-Riau. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Kimia dan Pendidikan Kimia 2016. Medan: Universitas Medan Press.

Deta, U. A., Suparmi, & Widha, S. (2013). Pengaruh Metode Inkuiri Terbimbing dan Proyek, Kreativitas, serta Keterampilan Proses Sains terhadap Prestasi Belajar Siswa. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Indonesia. 9(1), 28-34.

Deta, U. A., & Suprapto, N. (2012). Pembelajaran Fisika Model Diskusi Ditinjau dari Kecerdasan Interpersonal Siswa. Jurnal Penelitian Fisika dan Aplikasinya (JPFA). 2(1), 30-36

Dvorak, H. S. (2016). Learning to argue in EAP: Evaluating a curriculum innovation from the inside. Journal of English for Academic Purposes. 22. 19-31.

Hadi, S., & Farida, F. S. (2012). Pengaruh Minat, Kemandirian, dan Sumber Belajar terhadap Prestasi Belajar Siswa Pada Mata Pelajaran IPS Kelas VII SMP Negeri 5 Ungaran. Jurnal Pendidikan Ekonomi Dinamika Pendidikan. 7(1), 8-13.

Hamid, H. (2012). Pengembangan Kurikulum Pendidikan. Bandung: CV Pustaka Setia.

Haster, E., Rohiat, S., & Sumpono. (2019). StudiKomparasiMotivasiBelajar Kimia Siswa Kelas X Program Peminatan dan Lintas Minat di MAN 2 Kota Bengkulu. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Ilmu Kimia. 3(1), 57-64.

Hastuti & Iraning, Y. (2014). Implementasi Pembelajaran Lintas Minat Di SMA Negeri 1 Lawang Berdasarkan Kurikulum 2013. Skripsi tidak diterbitkan. Malang: PPs Universitas Negeri Malang

Karli, H. (2014). Perbedaan Kurikulum Tingkat Satuan Pendidikan 2006 dan Kurikulum 2013 untuk Jenjang Sekolah Dasar. Jurnal Pendidikan Penabur. 5(22), 24-30.

Katuuk, D. A. (2014). Manajemen Implementasi Kurikulum: Strategi Penguatan Implementasi Kurikulum 2013. Jurnal Cakrawala Pendidikan. 33(1), 13-26.

Kemendikbud. (2017). Model Peminatan dan Lintas Minat. Jakarta: Kementrian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan.

Kuntari, F. R., Rondonuwu, F. S., & Sudjito, D. N. (2019). Understanding by Design (UbD) for the Physics Learning about Parabolic Motion. Jurnal Penelitian Fisika dan Aplikasinya (JPFA). 9(1), 32-43

Parmin, Saregar, A., Deta, U. A., & Islami, R. A. Z. E.(2020). Indonesian Science Teachers’ Views on Attitude, Knowledge, and Application of STEM. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young. 8(1), 17-31.

Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Nomor 64 Tahun 2014 tentang Peminatan Pada Pendidikan Menengah. (2014). Jakarta: Kemendikbud.

Meliawati, W., Triastono, & Masjhudi. (2016). Survei Pelaksanaan Lintas Minat pada Mata Pelajaran Biologi Beserta Analisis Kendala Pelaksanaan di SMA Negeri Se Kota Malang. Jurnal Pendidikan Hayati. 1(1), 11-21.

Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldana, J. (2014). Qualitative Data Analysis, A Methods Sourcebook, Edition 3. USA: Sage Publications. Terjemahan Tjetjep Rohindi Rohidi, UI-Press.

Mulyana, D. (2010). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: PT Remaja.

Nofitasari, I., & Sihombing, Y. (2017). Deskripsi Kesulitan Belajar Peserta Didik dan Faktor Penyebabnya dalam Memahami Materi Listrik Dinamis Kelas X SMA Negeri 2 Bengkayang. Jurnal Penelitian Fisika dan Aplikasinya (JPFA). 7(1), 44-53

Nurhasanah, S., & Sobandi, A. (2016). Minat Belajar Sebagai Determinan Hasil Belajar Siswa. Jurnal Pendidikan Manajemen Perkantoran. 1(1), 128-135.

Oktadiani, F. S. (2014). Persepsi siswa pada mata pelajaran ekonomi (studi kasus peminatan di sma negeri 1 pontianak). Tesis tidak diterbitkan.

Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Nomor 22 Tahun 2016 tentang Standar Proses Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah. 2016. Jakarta: Kemendikbud.

Pratama, Y. M. P., Iswari, R. S., & Ngabekti, S.(2018). Korelasi Persepsi dan Minat Dengan Hasil Belajar Siswa Kelas 10 Lintas Minat Biologi SMAN 1 Ambarawa. Penomenon : Jurnal Pendidikan MIPA. 8(1), 57-61.

Riafadilah, A., & Dewi, L. (2018). Evaluasi Terhadap Implementasi Lintas Minat Dalam Kelompok Peminatan Di SMA/MA Kecamatan Lembang. Jurnal Penelitian dan Ilmu Pendidikan. 11(2), 128-133.

Sukmadinata, N. S. (2005). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan. Bandung: Remaja Rosda Karya.

Susanti, W., & Jatmiko, B. (2016). Implementasi Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe TAI (Team Assisted Individualization) untuk Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Fisika Siswa SMA pada Materi Elastisitas. Jurnal Penelitian Fisika dan Aplikasinya (JPFA). 6(1), 26-33

Suyidno, Susilowati, E., Arifuddin, M., Misbah, Sunarti, T., & Dwikoranto. (2019). Increasing Students’ Responsibility and Scientific Creativity through Creative Responsibility Based Learning. Jurnal Penelitian Fisika dan Aplikasinya (JPFA). 9(2), 178-188

UU No. 20 Tahun 2003 tentang Sistem Pendidikan Nasional

Widiawati, K. A., Sudiana, K., & Wiratini, M.(2019). Pengelolaan Pembelajaran Kimia Peminatan dan Lintas Minat Di Tingkat SMA. Jurnal Pendidikan Kimia Indonesia. 3(1), 24-31.

Zevin, B., Sheahan, G., Ashamalla, S., Dedy, N. J., Jalink, D., & Grantcharov, T. (2019). Implementation and evaluation of a comprehensive proficiency-based curriculum in an advanced, minimally invasive procedure: a multi-institutional Canadian experience. Surgery for Obesity and Related Diseases, 15(11), 1956-1964.

Zhao, D., Ma, X., & Qiao, S. (2017). What aspects should be evaluated when evaluating graduate curriculum: Analysis based on student interview. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 54, 50-57.

Zhu, Y., & Shu, D. (2017). Implementing foreign language curriculum innovation in a Chinese secondary school: An ethnographic study on teacher cognition and classroom practices. System, 66, 100-112.

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


View My Stats