Smart Apps Creator 3 Interactive Multimedia Based on Stream to Improve Students' Scientific Literacy During the Covid-19 Pandemic

Leny Heliawati(1), Fenny Pebriani(2), Didit Ardianto(3),

DOI: https://doi.org/10.46843/jiecr.v3i4.277


(1) Universitas Pakuan, Indonesia
(2) Universitas Pakuan, Indonesia
(3) MTs Al – Ma’tuq Putri Sukabumi, Indonesia

Abstract

By applying a learning-based approach model Science, Technology, Religion, Engineering, Arts, Mathematics in online learning, this study intends to investigate Smart Apps Creator, an interactive multimedia application to promote students' scientific literacy. SAC interactive multimedia is used to learn the media and comprehend scientific concepts. Explaining problems, designing research, carrying them out, analyzing data, evaluating findings, and sharing knowledge are all aspects of scientific literacy. Through the use of this program, STREAM-based learning is being used to improve students' scientific literacy. The results of the students' pretest and posttest were used to collect and analyze the study data in the form of quantitative descriptive analysis. With 80 responses among the students who participated in the survey and five science teachers who had used STREAM-based interactive multimedia, the study tool was delivered to the target population via a WhatsApp group. The findings indicated that the average percentage of scientific literacy with N-Gain in the medium category was 68%, indicating an improvement in student learning as a result of the use of SAC interactive multimedia learning. The study's findings demonstrate that SAC-based STREAM interactive multimedia learning is statistically highly significant and has been demonstrated to be successful in raising students' levels of scientific literacy in online learning during the present epidemic.

Keywords

sac interactive multimedia; stream; scientific literacy

Full Text:

PDF

References

Afifah, R. N. (2018). Pengembangan Lembar Kerja Siswa (Lks) Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam Berbasis Metode Percobaan. Science Activities, 12(2), 2086 – 2096. http://repository.upy.ac.id/227/.

Agustina, T. W., Rustaman, N., Riandi, R., & Purwianingsih, W. (2019). Traditional Biotechnology Content as a Media in Engaging Students with System Thinking Skills. Scientiae Educatia, 7(2), 197. https://doi.org/10.24235/sc.educatia.v7i2.3099.

Agustina, T. W., Rustaman, N. Y., Riandi, R., & Purwianingsih, W. (2018). Plant Physiology with Mathematic and Art Religion Engineering Science and Technology Approach. Proceedings of the International Conference on Islamic Education (ICIE 2018) (Vol. 261, No. ASSEHR, pp. 43-47). https://doi.org/10.2991/icie-18.2018.8.

Al Faris, F. (2016). Kurikulum 2013 Dalam Perspektif Filsafat Pendidikan Progressivisme. Jurnal Filsafat, 25(2), 316. https://doi.org/10.22146/jf.12687.

Aninda, A., Permanasari, A., & Ardianto, D. (2020). Implementasi Pembelajaran Berbasis Proyek Pada Materi Pencemaran Lingkungan untuk Meningkatkan Literasi STEM Siswa SMA. Journal of science education and practice, 3(2), 1-16. https://journal.unpak.ac.id/index.php/jsep/article/view/1719.

Ayuni, D., Marini, T., Fauziddin, M., & Pahrul, Y. (2020). Kesiapan Guru TK Menghadapi Pembelajaran Daring Masa Pandemi Covid-19. Jurnal Obsesi: Jurnal Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini, 5(1), 414.

Aziz Hussin, A. (2018). Education 4.0 Made Simple: Ideas for Teaching. International Journal of Education and Literacy Studies,6(3), 92-98. https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijels.v.6n.3p.92.

Azizah, W. A., Sarwi, S., & Ellianawati, E. (2020). Implementation of Project -Based Learning Model (PjBL) Using STREAM-Based Approach in Elementary Schools. Journal of Primary Education, 9(3), 238–247. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpe.v9i3.39950.

Bahri, S. (2018). Pengembangan Kurikulum Berbasis Multikulturalisme di Indonesia (Landasan Filosofis dan Psikologis Pengembangan Kurikulum Berbasis Multikulturalisme). In Jurnal Ilmiah DIDAKTIKA (Vol. 19, Issue 1, pp. 69–88).

Bao, W. (2020). COVID â€19 and Online Teaching in Higher Education: A Case Study of Peking University. Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies, 2(2), 113–115. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbe2.191.

Dewi, W. A. F. (2020). Dampak COVID-19 terhadap Implementasi Pembelajaran Daring di Sekolah Dasar. Edukatif: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 2(1), 55–61. https://doi.org/10.31004/edukatif.v2i1.89.

Dhawan, S. (2020). Online Learning: A Panacea in the Time of COVID-19 Crisis. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 49(1), 5–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047239520934018.

El Islami, R. A. Z., Nahadi, N., & Permanasari, A. (2016). Membangun Literasi Sains Siswa Pada Konsep Asam Basa Melalui Pembelajaran Inkuiri Terbimbing. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Pembelajaran IPA, 2(2), 110. https://doi.org/10.30870/jppi.v2i2.662.

English, L. D., & King, D. T. (2015). STEM learning through engineering design: fourth-grade students' investigations in aerospace. International Journal of STEM Education. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-015-0027-7.

Fitriyani, Y., Fauzi, I., & Sari, M. Z. (2020). Motivasi Belajar Mahasiswa pada Pembelajaran Daring Selama Pandemik Covid-19. Profesi Pendidikan Dasar, 7(1), 121–132. https://doi.org/10.23917/ppd.v7i1.10973.

Fraenkel, J.R., Wallen, N.E & Hyum, H. H. (2005). How to design and evaluate research in education (8th ed.). Mc. Graw Hill.

Gamar, M. M., Al Faruq, M. S., & Lina, L. (2018). Challenging the Indonesian Primary Education in Industrial Revolution 4.0 Era. 3rd International Conference on Education Management and Administration (CoEMA 2018), 269, 46–48. https://doi.org/10.2991/coema-18.2018.12.

George, D., & Mallery, P. (2018). IBM SPSS Statistics 25 Step by Step. In IBM SPSS Statistics 25 Step by Step. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351033909.

Hake, R. R. (1999). Analyzing Change/Gain Scores. Unpublished. [Online] URL: http://www. Physics. Indiana. Edu/~ sdi/AnalyzingChange-Gain. Pdf.

Hardjo, F. N., Permanasari, A., & Permana, I. (2019). Meningkatkan Literasi Sains Siswa Kelas 7 Melalui Pembelajaran Inkuiri Menggunakan Bahan Ajar Berbasis Proyek pada Materi Energi. Journal Of Science Education and Practice, 2(2), 1-9. https://journal.unpak.ac.id/index.php/jsep/article/view/1393.

Hodges, C., Moore, S., Lockee, B., Trust, T., & Bond, A. (2020). Remote Teaching and Online Learning. Educause Review, 1–15. https://er.Educause.edu/Articles/2020/3/the-Difference-Between-Emergency-Remote-Teaching-and-.

Inah, E. N. (2015). Peran Komunikasi Dalam Interaksi Guru Dan Siswa. Jurnal Al-Ta’dib, 8(2), 150–167.

Kartika, I., Kurniasih, S., & Pursitasari, I. D. (2019). Pengembangan Bahan Ajar Berbasis Socio-Scientific Issues Pada Materi Bioteknologi untuk Meningkatkan Literasi Sains Siswa. Journal of Science Education and Practice, 3(1), 1-12. https://journal.unpak.ac.id/index.php/jsep/article/view/1375

Khasanah, K., Muhlas, M., & Marwani, L. (2020). Development of E-Learning Smart Apps Creator (Sac) Learning Media for Selling Employees on Paid TV. Akademika, 9(02), 129–143.

Kusumaningsih, D., Ariyanto, B. A. W., Utami, H. B., & Ismaya, K. A. (2019). La PUISIFY the Form of Application-Based Poetry Learning Media SAC. 2.0 on Android. AKSIS: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Dan Sastra Indonesia, 3(2), 334–336. https://doi.org/10.21009/aksis.030210.

Mahase, E. (2020). Covid-19: WHO Declares Pandemic because of "Alarming Levels" of Spread, Severity, and Inaction. BMJ (Clinical Research Ed.), 368(m1036), 1. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.m1036.

Meilan, W., Rohiat, S., & Amir, H. (2017). Perbandingan Hasil Belajar Siswa Menggunakan Media Call Card dan Truth and Dare. ALOTROP, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.33369/atp.v1i1.2715.

Mubarok, H., Safitri, N. S., & Adam, A. S. (2020). (2020). The Novelty of Religion and Art: Should We Combine with STEM Education? Studies in Philosophy of Science and Education, 1(3), 97–103.

Nasir, M., Mulyono, Y., & Nastiti, L. R. (2020). Reconstructing distinction pattern of science education curriculum in Indonesian Islamic Universities: An integrated paradigm for science and religion. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 17(1), 11–21. https://doi.org/10.36681/tused.2020.10.

Odegaard, M., Haug, B., Mork, S., & Sorvik, G. O. (2015). Budding Science and Literacy. A Classroom Video Study of the Challenges and Support in an Integrated Inquiry and Literacy Teaching Model. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 167(1877), 274–278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.12.674.

OECD. (2003). Literacy Skills for The World of Tomorrow – Further results from PISA 2000. Chapter 1: Programme for International Student Assessment and non-OECD countries. OECD Publishing.

OECD. (2013). PISA 2012. Assessment and analytical framework: mathematics, reading, science, problem solving and financial literacy. OECD Publishing. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264190511-en.

OECD & ADB. (2015). Education in Indonesia: Rising to the Challenge. OECD Publishing

OECD. (2016). PISA 2015 Results: What students know and can do – student performance in reading, mathematics and science (Volume I). dx.doi.org.

OECD. (2017). PISA For development assessment and analitical framework: Reading, mathematics and science. www.oecd.org/about/publishing/corrigenda.htm.

OECD. (2019). PISA 2018 Assessment and Analytical Framework. Paris: OECD Publishing.

Orgaz, F., Moral, S., & Domínguez, C. (2018). Student's Attitude and Perception with the Use of Technology in the University. Journal of Educational Psychology - Propositos Y Representaciones, 6(2), 277–299. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.20511/pyr2018.v6n2.230.

Pane, A., & Dasopang, M. D. (2017). Belajar Dan Pembelajaran. Jurnal Kajian Ilmu-Ilmu Keislaman, 03(2), 333–352.

Rokhmah, A., Sunarno, W., & Masykuri, M. (2017). Science Literacy Indicators in Optical Instruments of Highschool Physics Textbooks Chapter. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Indonesia, 13(1), 19–24. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpfi.v13i1.8391.

Rosyad, M. F., Elektro, T., Teknik, F., & Surabaya, U. N. (2013). Perbandingan Hasil Belajar Siswa Yang Menggunakan Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe Nht Dengan Tipe Jigsaw Di SMKN 1 Jetis Mojokerto. Jurnal Pendidikan Teknik Elektro, 3(1), 63–68.

Rusyati, R., Permanasari, A., & Ardianto, D. (2019). Rekonstruksi Bahan Ajar Berbasis STEM untuk Meningkatkan Literasi Sains dan Tekonologi Siswa Pada Konsep Kemagnetan. Journal of Science Education and Practice, 2(2), 10-22. https://journal.unpak.ac.id/index.php/jsep/article/view/1395.

Sadikin, A., & Hamidah, A. (2020). Pembelajaran Daring di Tengah Wabah Covid-19. Biodik, 6(2), 109–119. https://doi.org/10.22437/bio.v6i2.9759.

Safitri, A., Fauzi, A., & Wulan, R. (2018). Analisis Kesesuaian Tujuan Kurikulum Pada Buku Teks Pelajaran Ipa Smp / Mts Kelas Vii Semester 2 Untuk Diintegrasikan Dengan Materi Tsunami Universitas Negeri Padang. Pillar of Physics Education, 11(2), 9–16. http://ejournal.unp.ac.id/students/index.php/pfis/article/view/3297.

Shatri, Z. G. (2020). Advantages and disadvantages of using information technology in learning process of students. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 17(3), 420–428. https://doi.org/10.36681/tused.2020.36.

Simamora, A. B., Widodo, W., & Sanjaya, I. G. M. (2020). Innovative Learning Model: Improving the Students' Scientific Literacy of Junior High School. IJORER: International Journal of Recent Educational Research, 1(3), 271–285. https://doi.org/10.46245/ijorer.v1i3.55.

Sintema, E. J. (2020). Effect of COVID-19 on the Performance of Grade 12 Students: Implications for STEM Education. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 16(7), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/7893.

Sugiyono. (2016). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Sultoni, A. (2016). Implementasi Kurikulum 2013 Dalam Mengembangkan Sikap Religius Siswa Melalui Bidang Studi Biologi di Madrasah Aliyah. Jurnal Pendidikan Agama Islam (Journal of Islamic Education Studies), 4(1), 68. https://doi.org/10.15642/pai.2016.4.1.68-91.

Sumantri, M., & Permana, J. (1999). Strategi Belajar Mengajar. Direktorat Jendral Pendidikan Tinggi.

Suratno, S., Wahono, B., Chang, C. Y., Retnowati, A., & Yushardi, Y. (2020). Exploring a Direct Relationship between Students' Problem-Solving Abilities and Academic Achievement: A STEM Education at a Coffee Plantation Area. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 17(2), 211–224. https://doi.org/10.36681/tused.2020.22.

Traxler, J. (2018). Distance learning—Predictions and possibilities. Education Sciences, 8(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci8010035.

Trilling, B., & Fadel, C. (2010). 21st Century Skills: Learning for Life in Our Times. Jossey-Bass.

Ülger, B. B., & Çepni, S. (2020). Gifted education and STEM: A thematic review. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 17(3), 443–467. https://doi.org/10.36681/tused.2020.38.

United Nations. (2020). Policy Brief: The Impact of on children. USA: United Nations.

Wan, S. A. W. M. D., Mokhtar, M., & Yasim, A. M. (2020). Using Technologies to Cultivate Creativity in Visual Art. DEStech Transactions on Social Science, Education and Human Science, ICEdDE, 343–348. https://doi.org/10.12783/dtssehs/icedde2019/33707.

Wang, J., & Zhao, Y. (2016). Comparative research on the understandings of nature of science and scientific inquiry between science teachers from Shanghai and Chicago. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 15(1), 97–108.

WEFUSA. (2015). World economic forum, new vision for education unlocking the potential of technology. http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEFUSA_New-VisionforEducation_Report 2015.pdf.

Winarni, E. W. (2011). Penelitian Pendidikan. Bengkulu: FKIP Universitas Bengkulu.

Winarni, E. W. (2012). Inovasi dalam Pembelajaran IPA. Bengkulu: FKIP Universitas Bengkulu.

World Health Organization. (2020). Key Messages and Actions for COVID-19 Prevention and Control in Schools (L. Bender (ed.); Issue March). UNICEF.

Yuningsih, W., Permanasari, A., & Permana, I. (2022). Multimedia Development of Science Learning Based on Science Literacy on The Theme of Lightning. JSEP (Journal of Science Education and Practice), 4(2), 69-84. https://journal.unpak.ac.id/index.php/jsep/issue/view/507.

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


View My Stats