The Student Teams Achievement Divisions Learning Model in Its Influence on the Motivation and Science Learning Outcomes of Elementary School Students

Widdy H.F Rorimpandey(1), Ferawati Maaluas(2), Jeanne Mangangantung(3), Hadi Suryanto(4),

DOI: https://doi.org/10.46843/jiecr.v3i3.72


(1) Universitas Negeri Manado, Indonesia
(2) Universitas Negeri Manado, Indonesia
(3) Universitas Negeri Manado, Indonesia
(4) Universitas PGRI Adi Buana, Indonesia

Abstract

This study aims to examine the effect of the Student Team Achievement Divisions learning model on the motivation and science learning outcomes of elementary school students. This study used an experimental research method with a non-equivalent group pretest-posttest design without a random control group. The subjects of this research were the fourth grade elementary school students, totaling 30 students. Where the experimental class amounted to 15 people and the control class amounted to 15 people. The research instruments were in the form of questionnaires and tests. The analysis technique used the independent sample t-test technique with a significance level of 0.05. The results of this study indicate First, there are differences in science learning outcomes between students who take lessons with the Student Team Achievment Divisions learning model and students who take lessons with conventional learning models. Second, there are differences in the level of motivation between students who take lessons with the Student Team Achievement Divisions learning model and students who take lessons using conventional learning models. This cooperative learning increases motivation because of the fun game by interacting with each other in the group. Third, there is a significant effect between the Student Team Achievement Divisions learning model on motivation and science learning outcomes compared to conventional lecture learning models.

Keywords

STAD model; motivation to learn; science learning outcomes; Primary school

Full Text:

PDF

References

Adams, A. M., Soto-Calvo, E., Francis, H. N., Patel, H., Hartley, C., Giofrè, D., & Simmons, F. R. (2021). Characteristics of the preschool home literacy environment which predict writing skills at school. Reading and Writing, 34(9), 2203–2225. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11145-021-10133-W/FULLTEXT.HTML

Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing : a revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives. Longman.

Arends, R. I. (2012). Learning to Teach. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004

Aydın, G., & Michou, A. (2019). Self-determined motivation and academic buoyancy as predictors of achievement in normative settings. British Journal of Educational Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12338

Bandura, A. (1982). Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. American Psychologist, 37(2), 122–147.

Barnes, J. (2020). Promoting Student Agency in Writing. Reading Teacher, 73(6), 789–795. https://doi.org/10.1002/TRTR.1899

Bendall, R. C. A., & Thompson, C. (2016). Emotion does not influence prefrontal cortex activity during a visual attention task. A functional near-infrared spectroscopy study. https://doi.org/10.5176/2251-1865_CBP16.10

Bonwell, C. C., & Eison, J. A. (1991). Active learning : creating excitement in the classroom. Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED336049

Borowski, P. F. (2021). Innovation strategy on the example of companies using bamboo. Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13731-020-00144-2

Brindley, J. E., Walti, C., & Blaschke, L. M. (2009). Creating effective collaborative learning groups in an online environment. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 10(3), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v10i3.675

Broadbent, J., & Fuller-Tyszkiewicz, M. (2018). Profiles in self-regulated learning and their correlates for online and blended learning students. Educational Technology Research and Development, 66(6), 1435–1455. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-018-9595-9

Cacciamani, S., Perrucci, V., & Khanlari, A. (2018). Conversational functions for knowledge building communities: a coding scheme for online interactions. Educational Technology Research and Development, 66(6), 1529–1546. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-018-9621-y

Cheon, S. H., Reeve, J., & Vansteenkiste, M. (2020). When teachers learn how to provide classroom structure in an autonomy-supportive way: Benefits to teachers and their students. Teaching and Teacher Education. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TATE.2019.103004

Daniela, P. (2015). The Relationship Between Self-Regulation, Motivation And Performance At Secondary School Students. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 191, 2549–2553. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SBSPRO.2015.04.410

Darwin, S. (2011). Learning in activity: Exploring the methodological potential of action research in activity theorising of social practice. Educational Action Research, 19(2), 215–229. https://doi.org/10.1080/09650792.2011.569230

Degeng, I. N. S. (2013). Ilmu pembelajaran: klarifikasi variabel untuk Pengembangan Teori dan Penelitian (1st ed.). Bandung: Aras media.

Diaconu-Gherasim, L. R., Măirean, C., & Brumariu, L. E. (2019). Quality of teachers’ and peers’ behaviors and achievement goals: The mediating role of self-efficacy. Learning and Individual Differences, 73, 147–156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2019.06.001

Donelan, H., & Kear, K. (2018). Creating and collaborating: Students’ and Tutors’ perceptions of an online group project. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 19(2), 37–54. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v19i2.3124

Elliot, A. J., & Moller, A. C. (2003). Performance-approach goals: Good or bad forms of regulation? International Journal of Educational Research, 39(4–5), 339–356. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2004.06.003

Ellis, N. J., Alonzo, D., & Nguyen, H. T. M. (2020). Elements of a quality pre-service teacher mentor: A literature review. Teaching and Teacher Education, 92. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TATE.2020.103072

Gómez, E. S., Núñez, M. J. S., Trapero, N. P., & Gómez, Ã. I. P. (2019). Action research through lesson study for the reconstruction of teachers’ practical knowledge. A review of research at Málaga University (Spain). Educational Action Research. https://doi.org/10.1080/09650792.2019.1610020

Grinfelde, I., & Veliverronena, L. (2018). The limits of creative approach: Conducting an orchestra of emotions in the darkness. Creativity Studies, 11(2), 362–376. https://doi.org/10.3846/cs.2018.7183

Hulleman, C. S., & Cordray, D. S. (2009). Methodological studies: Moving from the lab to the field: The role of fidelity and achieved relative intervention strength. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 2(1), 87–110. https://doi.org/10.1080/19345740802539325

Jenkins, E. M., Zaher, Z., Tikkanen, S. A., & Ford, J. L. (2019). Creative identity (re)Construction, creative community building, and creative resistance: A qualitative analysis of queer ingroup members’ tweets after the Orlando Shooting. Computers in Human Behavior, 101, 14–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.07.004

Kowalski, S. M., Taylor, J. A., Askinas, K. M., Wang, Q., Zhang, Q., Maddix, W. P., & Tipton, E. (2020). Examining Factors Contributing to Variation in Effect Size Estimates of Teacher Outcomes from Studies of Science Teacher Professional Development. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness. https://doi.org/10.1080/19345747.2020.1726538

Liu, C. C., Cheng, Y. B., & Huang, C. W. (2011). The effect of simulation games on the learning of computational problem solving. Computers and Education, 57(3), 1907–1918. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.04.002

Markova, M., Modliński, A., & Moreira Pinto, L. (2020). Creative or analitical way for career development? Relationship marketing in the field of international business education. Creativity Studies, 13(1), 99–113. https://doi.org/10.3846/cs.2020.6625

Nemiro, J. E. (2021). Developing collaborative behaviours in elementary school students: a comparison of robotics versus maths teams. Educational Studies, 47(5), 521–537. https://doi.org/10.1080/03055698.2020.1716209

Neroni, J., Meijs, C., Gijselaers, H. J. M., Kirschner, P. A., & de Groot, R. H. M. (2019). Learning strategies and academic performance in distance education. Learning and Individual Differences, 73, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2019.04.007

Ramadhani, R., Umam, R., Abdurrahman, A., & Syazali, M. (2019). The Effect of Flipped-Problem Based Learning Model Integrated With LMS-Google Classroom for Senior High School Students. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists, 7(2), 137–158. https://doi.org/10.17478/jegys.548350

Shih, J. L., Shih, B. J., Shih, C. C., Su, H. Y., & Chuang, C. W. (2010). The influence of collaboration styles to children’s cognitive performance in digital problem-solving game “william Adventureâ€: A comparative case study. Computers and Education, 55(3), 982–993. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.04.009

Stevanović, A., Božić, R., & Radović, S. (2021). Higher education students’ experiences and opinion about distance learning during the Covid-19 pandemic. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 37(6), 1682–1693. https://doi.org/10.1111/JCAL.12613

Suryanto, H. (2020). Hubungan interaksi sosial antar siswa dengan kreativitas belajar dalam memahami pelajaran IPS. Journal of Creative Attitudes Culture, 1(1), 19–33. Retrieved from https://journalofdiversity.com/index.php/jcac/article/view/23

Suryanto, H., Degeng, I. N. S., Djatmika, E. T., & Kuswandi, D. (2021). The effect of creative problem solving with the intervention social skills on the performance of creative tasks. Creativity Studies, 14(2), 323–335. https://doi.org/10.3846/CS.2021.12364

Suryanto, H., Degeng, N. S., Djatmika, E. T., & Kuswandi, D. (2020). The Effect of Creative Problem Solving Learning Strategy on Conceptual and Procedural Understanding Moderated by Social Skills. In International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change. www.ijicc.net (Vol. 13). Retrieved from www.ijicc.net

Suryanto, H., Warring, S., Kartikowati, R. S., Rorimpandey, W. H., & Gunawan, W. (2021). Study creativity with diverse social skills to support the learning process in future education. JDIL Journal of Diversity in Learning, 1(2), 85–89. https://doi.org/10.1300/J104v03n01_03

Tadesse, T., Gillies, R. M., & Manathunga, C. (2020). Shifting the instructional paradigm in higher education classrooms in Ethiopia: What happens when we use cooperative learning pedagogies more seriously? International Journal of Educational Research, 99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2019.101509

Tyng, C. M., Amin, H. U., Saad, M. N. M., & Malik, A. S. (2017, August 24). The influences of emotion on learning and memory. Frontiers in Psychology, Vol. 8. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01454

Ukkonen-Mikkola, T., & Varpanen, J. (2020). Integrated initial and continuing training as a way of developing the professional agency of teachers and student teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 96. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TATE.2020.103189

Wang, K., & Nickerson, J. V. (2017, September 1). A literature review on individual creativity support systems. Computers in Human Behavior, Vol. 74, pp. 139–151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.04.035

Webb, N. M., Franke, M. L., Ing, M., Turrou, A. C., Johnson, N. C., & Zimmerman, J. (2017, January 1). Teacher practices that promote productive dialogue and learning in mathematics classrooms. International Journal of Educational Research. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2017.07.009

Wirthwein, L., Bergold, S., Preckel, F., & Steinmayr, R. (2019). Personality and school functioning of intellectually gifted and nongifted adolescents: Self-perceptions and parents’ assessments. Learning and Individual Differences, 73, 16–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2019.04.003

Xue, S., & Churchill, D. (2019). A review of empirical studies of affordances and development of a framework for educational adoption of mobile social media. Educational Technology Research and Development. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-019-09679-y

Yang, Y. T. C. (2015). Virtual CEOs: A blended approach to digital gaming for enhancing higher order thinking and academic achievement among vocational high school students. Computers and Education, 81, 281–295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.10.004

Zacharia, Z. C., Xenofontos, N. A., & Manoli, C. C. (2011). The effect of two different cooperative approaches on students’ learning and practices within the context of a WebQuest science investigation. Educational Technology Research and Development, 59(3), 399–424.

Zumbrunn, S., Broda, M., Varier, D., & Conklin, S. (2019). Examining the multidimensional role of self-efficacy for writing on student writing self-regulation and grades in elementary and high school. British Journal of Educational Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12315

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


View My Stats