The Moderating Role of Gender in the Relationship Between Teacher Competence, Learning Satisfaction, and Students' Intrinsic Motivation

Maryono Maryono(1), Dede Dwi Kurniasih(2), Muhammad Hafidz Khusnadin(3), Samsuddin Samsuddin(4), Siswanto Siswanto(5), Roma Wijaya(6),


(1) Sekolah Tinggi Agama Islam Syubbanul Wathon Magelang, Indonesia
(2) Nasyiatul Aisyiyah Jakarta, Indonesia
(3) Institut Agama Islam Negeri Metro Lampung, Indonesia
(4) Sekolah Tinggi Agama Islam Al-Hidayah Bogor, Indonesia
(5) Sekolah Tinggi Agama Islam Syubbanul Wathon Magelang, Indonesia
(6) Ankara Üniversitesi, Türkiye

Abstract

Teacher competence is a key factor in creating an effective learning experience in the educational environment, especially in Indonesia's secondary education context. There is still a gap in understanding the role of learning satisfaction as a mediator in the relationship. This study explores the relationship between teacher competence, student learning satisfaction, and students' intrinsic motivation at the secondary education level. This study explores the relationship between teacher competence, student learning satisfaction, and students' intrinsic motivation at the secondary education level. Using the Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) approach, data was analyzed from 100 students to identify the impact of teacher competence on learning satisfaction and intrinsic motivation. The results showed that teacher competence significantly had a positive effect on student learning satisfaction with a pathway coefficient of 0.809 (p < 0.01) and had a positive impact on students' intrinsic motivation with a coefficient of 0.345 (p < 0.05). In addition, learning satisfaction was proven to have a significant mediating role in the relationship between teacher competence and intrinsic motivation, with a pathway coefficient of 0.493 (p < 0.01). These findings support the importance of teacher competency development in improving a satisfying and motivating learning experience for students. This research has practical implications for educational institutions in strengthening teacher training programs and strategies to improve teaching quality to support the overall academic development of students.

Keywords

Teacher competence, learning satisfaction, intrinsic motivation, structural equation modeling

Full Text:

PDF

References

Ahn, I., Chiu, M. M., & Patrick, H. (2021). Connecting teacher and student motivation: Student-perceived teacher need-supportive practices and student need satisfaction. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 64, 1–12.

Bachmann, N., Tripathi, S., Brunner, M., & Jodlbauer, H. (2022). The contribution of data-driven technologies in achieving the sustainable development goals. Sustainability, 14(5), 1–20.

Baier, F., Decker, A. T., Voss, T., Kleickmann, T., Klusmann, U., & Kunter, M. (2019). What makes a good teacher? The relative importance of mathematics teachers' cognitive ability, personality, knowledge, beliefs, and motivation for instructional quality. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 89(4), 767–786.

Bardach, L., Klassen, R. M., & Perry, N. E. (2022). Teachers' psychological characteristics: Do they matter for teacher effectiveness, teachers' well-being, retention, and interpersonal relations? An integrative review. Educational Psychology Review, 34(1), 259–300.

Bürgener, L., & Barth, M. (2018). Sustainability competencies in teacher education: Making teacher education count in everyday school practice. Journal of Cleaner Production, 174, 821–826.

Carpenter, S. K., Witherby, A. E., & Tauber, S. K. (2020). On students' (mis)judgments of learning and teaching effectiveness. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 9(2), 137–151.

Caskurlu, S., Maeda, Y., Richardson, J. C., & Lv, J. (2020). A meta-analysis addressing the relationship between teaching presence and students' satisfaction and learning. Computers and Education, 157, 1–15.

Chamizo-Nieto, M. T., Arrivillaga, C., Rey, L., & Extremera, N. (2021). The role of emotional intelligence, the teacher-student relationship, and flourishing on academic performance in adolescents: A moderated mediation study. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 1–12.

Chaudhuri, J. D. (2020). Stimulating intrinsic motivation in millennial students: A new generation, a new approach. Anatomical Sciences Education, 13(2), 250–271.

Choe, R. C., Scuric, Z., Eshkol, E., Cruser, S., Arndt, A., Cox, R., Toma, S. P., Shapiro, C., Levis-Fitzgerald, M., Barnes, G., & Crosbie, R. H. (2019). Student satisfaction and learning outcomes in asynchronous online lecture videos. CBE Life Sciences Education, 18(4), 1–14.

Cole, A. W., Lennon, L., & Weber, N. L. (2021). Student perceptions of online active learning practices and online learning climate predict online course engagement. Interactive Learning Environments, 29(5), 866–880.

Colomer-Rubio, J. C., Hernández-Gassó, H., & Engen, B. K. (2019). Digital competence for teachers: Perspectives and foresights for a new school. Comunicar Journal, 61(4), 9–18.

Cruz-Sandoval, M., Vázquez-Parra, J. C., Carlos-Arroyo, M., & Amézquita-Zamora, J. A. (2024). Student perception of the level of development of complex thinking: An approach involving university women in Mexico. Journal of Latinos and Education, 23(2), 768–780.

Deci, E. L., Ryan, R. M., & Williams, G. C. (1996). Need satisfaction and the self-regulation of learning. Learning and Individual Differences, 8(3), 165–183.

Eccles, J. S., & Wigfield, A. (2020). From expectancy-value theory to situated expectancy-value theory: A developmental, social cognitive, and sociocultural perspective on motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 61, 1–12.

Fernández-Batanero, J. M., Montenegro-Rueda, M., Fernández-Cerero, J., & García-Martínez, I. (2022). Digital competences for teacher professional development: Systematic review. European Journal of Teacher Education, 45(4), 513–531.

González, Á. L. O., Navarro, Ó., Sánchez-Verdejo, F. J., & Muelas, Á. (2020). Psychological well-being and intrinsic motivation: Relationship in students who begin university studies at the School of Education in Ciudad Real. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 1–12.

Gordon, L. M. (2001). High teacher efficacy as a marker of teacher effectiveness in the domain of classroom management. Educational Psychology Review, 13(1), 1–12.

Gray, J. A., & Diloreto, M. (2016). The effects of student engagement, student satisfaction, and perceived learning in online learning environments. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 11(1), 1–20.

Jang, H. R. (2019). Teachers' intrinsic vs. extrinsic instructional goals predict their classroom motivating styles. Learning and Instruction, 60, 286–300.

McGarr, O. (2020). The use of virtual simulations in teacher education to develop pre-service teachers' behavior and classroom management skills: Implications for reflective practice. Journal of Education for Teaching, 46(2), 159–169.

Misbah, Z., Gulikers, J., Widhiarso, W., & Mulder, M. (2022). Exploring connections between teacher interpersonal behavior, student motivation and competency level in competence-based learning environments. Learning Environments Research, 25(3), 641–661.

Oliver, M. B., & Hyde, J. S. (1993). Gender differences in sexuality: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 114(1), 29–51.

Park, C., Kim, D., Cho, S., & Han, H. J. (2019). Adoption of multimedia technology for learning and gender difference. Computers in Human Behavior, 92, 288–296.

Powers, R. A., Cochran, J. K., Maskaly, J., & Sellers, C. S. (2020). Social learning theory, gender, and intimate partner violent victimization: A structural equations approach. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 35(17–18), 3554–3580.

Rotter, J. B. (2021). Social learning theory. In Expectations and actions (pp. 241–260). Routledge.

Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2020). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation from a self-determination theory perspective: Definitions, theory, practices, and future directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 61, 1–12.

Ryan, R. M., Stiller, J. D., & Lynch, J. H. (1994). Representations of relationships to teachers, parents, and friends as predictors of academic motivation and self-esteem. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 14(2), 226–249.

Sana, F., Yan, V. X., & Carvalho, P. F. (2022). On rest-from-deliberate-learning as a mechanism for the spacing effect: Commentary on Chen et al. (2021). Educational Psychology Review, 34(3), 1843–1850.

Schweder, S., & Raufelder, D. (2021). Needs satisfaction and motivation among adolescent boys and girls during self-directed learning intervention. Journal of Adolescence, 88, 1–13.

Shin, M., & Bolkan, S. (2021). Intellectually stimulating students' intrinsic motivation: The mediating influence of student engagement, self-efficacy, and student academic support. Communication Education, 70(2), 146–164.

Suharyatia, H., Laihadb, G. H., & Suchyadic, Y. (2019). Development of teacher creativity models to improve teacher's pedagogic competency in the educational era 4.0. International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change, 5(6), 919–929.

Sukmayadi, V., & Yahya, A. H. (2020). Indonesian education landscape and the 21st century challenges. Journal of Social Studies Education Research, 11(4), 219–234.

Tokan, M. K., & Imakulata, M. M. (2019). The effect of motivation and learning behaviour on student achievement. South African Journal of Education, 39(1), 1–8.

Vallerand, R. J. (2000). Deci and Ryan's self-determination theory: A view from the hierarchical model of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 312–318.

Wu, B., Yu, X., & Gu, X. (2020). Effectiveness of immersive virtual reality using head-mounted displays on learning performance: A meta-analysis. British Journal of Educational Technology, 51(6), 1991–2005.

Zhao, L., Liu, X., & Su, Y. S. (2021). The differentiate effect of self-efficacy, motivation, and satisfaction on pre-service teacher students' learning achievement in a flipped classroom: A case of a modern educational technology course. Sustainability, 13(5), 1–15.

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


View My Stats