The Transferability Level of Junior High School Students in Solving Geometry Problems

Anisa Agustin(1), Endah Retnowati(2), Khar Thoe Ng(3),


(1) Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Indonesia
(2) Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Indonesia
(3) SEAMEO RECSAM, Malaysia

Abstract

Transferability indicates that learners are able to use their knowledge to solve advanced problems. This study aimed to elaborate in detail the level of transferability both near and  far transferability of junior high school students in solving geometry problems, and to reveal some factors causing errors in doing the transfer test. Geometry in this study covered solid prism and pyramid. This qualitative descriptive study involved as many as 157 Grade VIII students in one of the junior high schools in Sleman Regency, Indonesia. The data were collected through a written test taken by all participants and interviews with 16 students selected based on the category of the transfer test results. This results of the study showed that (1) based on the average test scores, all students acquired fair transferability, (2) based on the near transfer test item, all students could be categorized as having high transferability, (3) based on the far transfer test items, all students could be categorized as having low transferability, (4) The factors that caused student errors were: (i) difficulties in showing information of what is known in the given context of the transfer problem; (ii) difficulties in stating what is asked in the given problems; (iii) difficulties in using conceptual, procedural, and technical knowledge in executing the strategy of solution; (iv) difficulties in drawing correct conclusions. This result of this study have raised concerns regarding the importance of learning strategy that facilitate transferability.

Keywords

transferability; near transfer; far transfer; factor of student errors; geometry problem

Full Text:

PDF

References

Anderson, W. L. & Krathwohl, D. L. (2001). A taxonomy for learning teaching and assessing: a revision of bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives. New York, NY: Logman.

Azwar, S. (2012). Penyusunan skala psikologi. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Britton, S., New, P., Roberts, A., et al. (2007). Investitating students’ ability to transfer mathematics. Sydney: Sydney University Press.

Dixon, R. A. & Brown, R. A. (2012). Transfer of learning: Connecting concepts during problem solving. Journal of Technology Education, 24(1), 2-17.

Kemendikbud. (2019). Hasil PISA Indonesia 2018. Siaran Press. Nomor: 397/Sipres/A5.3/XII/2019. https://www.kemdikbud.go.id/main/blog/2019/12/hasil-pisa-indonesia-2018-akses-makin-meluas-saatnya-tingkatkan-kualitas

Mayer, R. E. (2002). Rote versus meaningful learning. Theory into Practice, 41(4), 226-232.

Miles, M. & Huberman, M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis (2nd ed.). California, CA: Sage.

Musa, M., Suprapti, E., & Soemantri, S. (2018). Analisis strategi peserta didik dalam menyelesaikan masalah sistem persamaan linear dua variabel. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran Matematika, 4(2), 132-146. http://e-jurnal.unisda.ac.id/index.php/Inspiramatika/article/view/1270

Paas, F., & van Merriënboer, J. J. G. (2020). Cognitive-Load Theory: Methods to Manage Working Memory Load in the Learning of Complex Tasks. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 29(4), 394–398.

Purwasih, J. H. G. (2020). Kendala calon pendidik dalam membuat soal pilihan ganda higher order thinking (HOT). Jurnal Sosial Humaniora, 13(1), 12-22.

Perkins, D. N. & Salomon, G. (1992). Transfer of learning. International Encyclopedia of Education, Second Edition. Oxford, England: Pergamon Press

Rebello, N. S., Cui, L., Bennett, A. G., et al. (2007). Transfer of learning in problem solving in the context of mathematics and physics. In Book: Learning to Solve Complex Scientific Problems, 223-246.

Retnowati, E., Ayres, P., & Sweller, J. (2018). Collaborative learning effects when students have complete or incomplete knowledge. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 32(6), 681-692.

Sugiman, S., Retnowati, E., Ayres, P., et al. (2019). Learning goal-free problems: Collaboratively or individually? Jurnal Cakrawala Pendidikan, 38(3), 590-600.

Surya, E. (2012). Upaya pembelajaran matematika berbasis masalah dengan strategi konflik kognitif. Jurnal Tematik, 1(8), 1-14. http://digilib.unimed.ac.id/id/eprint/799

Sweller, J, Ayres, P, & Kalyuga, S. (2011). Cognitive Load Theory. London: Springer

Sweller, J. (2020). Cognitive load theory and educational technology. Education Tech Research Dev 68, 1–16.

Xu, K. M., et al. (2021). A growth mindset lowers perceived cognitive load and improves learning: Integrating motivation to cognitive load. Journal of Educational Psychology, 113(6), 1177–1191.

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


View My Stats