Improving Students’ Creative Thinking Skills by Combining Cooperative Script and Reciprocal Teaching Models

Ali Usman(1), Novy Eurika(2), Ika Priantari(3), Ahmad Rusdy Awalludin(4), Gumilang Mutiara Hilia(5),

DOI: https://doi.org/10.46843/jiecr.v4i3.684


(1) Universitas Muhammadiyah Jember, Indonesia
(2) Universitas Muhammadiyah Jember, Indonesia
(3) Universitas Muhammadiyah Jember, Indonesia
(4) Universitas Muhammadiyah Jember, Indonesia
(5) Universitas Muhammadiyah Jember, Indonesia

Abstract

This study aims to describe the increase in students' creative thinking by combining cooperative script learning models with reciprocal teaching. This research is a Class Action Research (CAR). This research was conducted in class XI SMA. Learning tools, essay questions combined with creative thinking, observation sheets of learning implementation, and creative thinking instruments were used to collect data. Data analysis on the increase in creative thinking was calculated using the score gain (N-Gain) formula. The results show an increase in students' creative thinking, namely from cycle I with a score of 0.28 which is included in the low category, rising to a score of 0.5 in cycle II which is included in the medium category. The results of this study indicate an increase in students' learning activities and creative thinking in each learning cycle. Combining cooperative and reciprocal learning models can encourage students to dare to express opinions, thoughts, and ideas to empower students' creative thinking skills. This shows that applying the cooperative learning model, a combination of collaborative learning models with a reciprocal teaching model used continuously, can increase students' learning activities and creative thinking to train them to become self-regulation learners.

Keywords

Cooperative script, Reciprocal teaching, Cooperative learning, Creative thinking

Full Text:

PDF

References

Asrizal, A., Mardian, V., Novitra, F., & Festiyed, F. (2022). Physics electronic teaching material-integrated STEM education to promote 21st-century skills. Cypriot Journal of Educational Sciences, 17(8), 2899–2914.

Baticulon, R. E., Sy, J. J., Alberto, N. R. I., Baron, M. B. C., Mabulay, R. E. C., Rizada, L. G. T., Tiu, C. J. S., Clarion, C. A., & Reyes, J. C. B. (2021). Barriers to Online Learning in the Time of COVID-19: A National Survey of Medical Students in the Philippines. Medical Science Educator, 31(2), 615–626. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40670-021-01231-z

Bdair, I. A. (2021). Nursing students’ and faculty members’ perspectives about online learning during COVID-19 pandemic: A qualitative study. Teaching and Learning in Nursing, 16(3), 220–226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.teln.2021.02.008

Benjamaha, J., & Uantrai, P. (2021). Active Learning Management based on MIAP Learning Model to Enhance Electronic Technician Competence. 2021 6th International STEM Education Conference (ISTEM-Ed), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1109/iSTEM-Ed52129.2021.9625152

Carr, W., & Kemmis, S. (1983). Becoming critical: Knowing through action research. Deakin University.

Chaiyama, N. (2018). The Instructional Design Blended Learning Model by Using Active Learning Activities to Develop Learning Skills in 21st Century for Higher Students. Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on E-Society, E-Education and E-Technology, 5–9. https://doi.org/10.1145/3268808.3268816

Chauhan, A., Khakhkhar, T., Khuteta, N., & Khilnani, G. (2022). Three-way summaries as a teaching–learning tool: Student perspective and impact on retention of learning. Journal of Education and Health Promotion, 11(1), 177. https://doi.org/10.4103/jehp.jehp_787_21

Chen, S.-Y., Lai, C.-F., Lai, Y.-H., & Su, Y.-S. (2019). Effect of project-based learning on development of students’ creative thinking. The International Journal of Electrical Engineering & Education, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020720919846808

Deeva, G., Bogdanova, D., Serral, E., Snoeck, M., & De Weerdt, J. (2021). A review of automated feedback systems for learners: Classification framework, challenges, and opportunities. Computers & Education, 162(104094), 1–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.104094

Dilekçi, A., & Karatay, H. (2023). The effects of the 21st-century skills curriculum on the development of students’ creative thinking skills. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 47, 101229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2022.101229

Fomina, T. G., Filippova, E. V., Ovanesbekova, M. L., &, & Morosanova, V. I. (2022). Conscious self-regulation and school engagement as resources for exam success: A longitudinal study. Russian Psychological Journal, 19(4), 110–121. https://doi.org/10.21702/rpj.2022.4.7

Gaeta, M. L., Gaeta, L., & Rodriguez, M. del S. (2021). The Impact of COVID-19 Home Confinement on Mexican University Students: Emotions, Coping Strategies, and Self-Regulated Learning. Frontiers in Psychology, 12(642823), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.642823

Grainger, R., Dai, W., Osborne, E., & Kenwright, D. (2018). Medical students create multiple-choice questions for learning in pathology education: a pilot study. BMC Medical Education, 18(1), 201. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-018-1312-1

Horváthová, B., & NaÄová, L. (2021). Developing Critical Thinking In Reading Comprehension of Texts For Specific Purposes At All Levels Of Bloom’s Taxonomy. Journal of Teaching English for Specific and Academic Purposes, 9(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.22190/JTESAP2101001H

Huang, Y.-M., Silitonga, L. M., & Wu, T.-T. (2022). Applying a business simulation game in a flipped classroom to enhance engagement, learning achievement, and higher-order thinking skills. Computers & Education, 183(104494), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2022.104494

Hursen, C. (2020). The Effect of Problem-Based Learning Method Supported by Web 2.0 Tools on Academic Achievement and Critical Thinking Skills in Teacher Education. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 515–533. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-020-09458-2

Jawad, L. F., Majeed, B. H., & ALRikabi, H. T. S. (2021). The Impact of Teaching by Using STEM Approach in The Development of Creative Thinking and Mathematical Achievement Among the Students of The Fourth Scientific Class. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies (IJIM), 15(13), 172–188. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v15i13.24185

Jian, Y.-C. (2022). Using an eye tracker to examine the effect of prior knowledge on reading processes while reading a printed scientific text with multiple representations. International Journal of Science Education, 44(8), 1209–1229. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2022.2072013

Kim, M. K., & McCarthy, K. S. (2021). Improving summary writing through formative feedback in a technologyâ€enhanced learning environment. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 37(3), 684–704. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12516

Klimova, B., Zamborova, K., Cierniak-Emerych, A., & Dziuba, S. (2022). University Students and Their Ability to Perform Self-Regulated Online Learning Under the COVID-19 Pandemic. Frontiers in Psychology, 13(781715), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.781715

Komatsu, H., Rappleye, J., & Silova, I. (2021). Student-Centered Learning and Sustainability: Solution or Problem? Comparative Education Review, 65(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1086/711829

Krishnaveni, P., & Balasundaram, S. R. (2021). Summarizing Learning Materials Using Graph-Based Multi-Document Summarization. International Journal of Web-Based Learning and Teaching Technologies, 16(5), 39–57. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJWLTT.20210901.oa3

Kurtz, J., Holman, B., & Monrad, S. U. (2020). Training Medical Students to Create and Collaboratively Review Multiple-Choice Questions: A Comprehensive Workshop. MedEdPORTAL. https://doi.org/10.15766/mep_2374-8265.10986

Levesque-Bristol, C., Richards, K. A. R., Zissimopoulos, A., Wang, C., & Yu, S. (2020). An evaluation of the integrative model for learning and motivation in the college classroom. Current Psychology, 41(3), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-020-00671-x

Listiana, L., & Bahri, A. (2019). Empowering student’s creative thinking skill in biology classroom: Potential of group investigation combined with think talk write (GITTW) strategy. Humanities and Social Sciences Reviews, 7(3), 477–483. https://doi.org/10.18510/hssr.2019.7370

Mason, N. L., Kuypers, K. P. C., Reckweg, J. T., Müller, F., Tse, D. H. Y., Da Rios, B., Toennes, S. W., Stiers, P., Feilding, A., & Ramaekers, J. G. (2021). Spontaneous and deliberate creative cognition during and after psilocybin exposure. Translational Psychiatry, 11(209), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41398-021-01335-5

McCarthy, K. S., Steinberg, J., Dreier, K., O’Reilly, T., Sabatini, J., Butterfuss, R., & McNamara, D. S. (2023). The effects of prior knowledge in a scenario-based comprehension assessment: A multidimensional approach. Learning and Individual Differences, 103, 102283. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2023.102283

Miao, J., & Ma, L. (2022). Students’ online interaction, self-regulation, and learning engagement in higher education: The importance of social presence to online learning. Frontiers in Psychology, 13(815220), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.815220

Paramasivam, A., & Nirmala, S. J. (2023). Exploring question generation in medical intelligent system using entailment. International Journal of Computers and Applications, 45(3), 248–253. https://doi.org/10.1080/1206212X.2022.2161147

Pérez, L. E., Vázquez Atochero, A., & Cambero Rivero, S. (2021). Educación a distancia en tiempos de COVID-19: Análisis desde la perspectiva de los estudiantes universitarios. RIED. Revista Iberoamericana de Educación a Distancia, 24(1), 331–350. https://doi.org/10.5944/ried.24.1.27855

Peters-Burton, E. E. (2018). Strategies for learning nature of science knowledge: A perspective from educational psychology. History, philosophy and science teaching: New perspectives, 167-193.. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62616-1_6

Pifarré, M., & Li, L. (2018). Characterizing and unpacking learning to learn together skills in a wiki project in primary education. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 29, 45–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2018.06.004

Purnomo, P. T., Romlie, M., & Dika, J. (2020). Comparation: Learning Results Engineering Mechanics Using Conventional Learning Model and Learning Cycle in Vocational High School. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists, 8(1), 393–406. https://doi.org/10.17478/jegys.668031

Purwati, N., Zubaidah, S., Corebima, A. D., & Mahanal, S. (2018). Increasing Islamic Junior High School Students Learning Outcomes through Integration of Science Learning and Islamic Values. International Journal of Instruction, 11(4), 841–854. https://doi.org/10.12973/iji.2018.11453a

Redifer, J. L., Bae, C. L., & Zhao, Q. (2021). Self-efficacy and performance feedback: Impacts on cognitive load during creative thinking. Learning and Instruction, 71(101395), 1–11.

Reichardt, R., Polner, B., & Simor, P. (2023). Influencing prior knowledge through a short reading impacts curiosity and learning. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 37(2), 458–464. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.4047

Rosales, R., Soldner, J. L., & Zhang, L. (2018). An Evaluation of the Pair Discussion Component of Interteaching. The Psychological Record, 68(1), 71–79. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40732-018-0269-0

Santos, G., Sá, J. C., Félix, M. J., Barreto, L., Carvalho, F., Doiro, M., Zgodavová, K., & Stefanović, M. (2021). New Needed Quality Management Skills for Quality Managers 4.0. Sustainability, 13(6149), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13116149

Shahin, M., Ilic, O., Gonsalvez, C., & Whittle, J. (2021). The impact of a STEM-based entrepreneurship program on the entrepreneurial intention of secondary school female students. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-020-00713-7

Sharma, S. (2021). A Response to Assessing the Role of Internal Motivation and Extrinsic Factors on Online Undergraduate Medical Teaching in a Resource-Poor Setting During Covid-19 Pandemic in North India: An Observational Study [Letter]. Advances in Medical Education and Practice, 12, 817–823.

Srikan, P., Pimdee, P., Leekitchwatana, P., & Narabin, A. (2021). A Problem-Based Learning (PBL) and Teaching Model using a Cloud-Based Constructivist Learning Environment to Enhance Thai Undergraduate Creative Thinking and Digital Media Skills. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies (IJIM), 15(22), 68–83. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v15i22.24963

Suharyati, H., Vonti, L. H., Suhardi, E., & Sunardi, O. (2020). Promoting knowledge management approach and active learning model in blended learning activities of higher education. International Journal of Innovation, Creativity, and Change, 12(9), 123–142.

Suherman., Vidákovich, T., & Komarudin. (2021). STEM-E: Fostering mathematical creative thinking ability in the 21st Century. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1882(1), 012164. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1882/1/012164

Sumardi, L., Rohman, A., & Wahyudiati, D. (2020). Does the Teaching and Learning Process in Primary Schools Correspond to the Characteristics of the 21st Century Learning? International Journal of Instruction, 13(3), 357–370. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2020.13325a

Treffinger, D. J., Young, G. C., Selby, E. C., & Shepardson, C. (2002). Assessing Creativity: A Guide for Educators. National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented.

Vosgerau, D. S. R., & Elias, A. P. de A. J. (2022). A Utilização Do Método De Análise De Conceitos Para A Compreensão Do Conceito De Aprendizagem Autorregulada. Psicologia Escolar e Educacional, 26, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1590/2175-35392022241008

Walker, K. A., & Koralesky, K. E. (2021). Student and instructor perceptions of engagement after the rapid online transition of teaching due to COVIDâ€19. Natural Sciences Education, 50(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1002/nse2.20038

Wannapiroon, N., & Pimdee, P. (2022). Thai undergraduate science, technology, engineering, arts, and math (STEAM) creative thinking and innovation skill development: a conceptual model using a digital virtual classroom learning environment. Education and Information Technologies, 27(4), 5689–5716. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10849-w

Wunnasari, W., Pailai, J., Hayashi, Y., & Hirashima, T. (2018). Reciprocal Kit-Build Concept Map: An Approach for Encouraging Pair Discussion to Share Each Other’s Understanding. IEICE Transactions on Information and Systems, E101.D(9), 2356–2367. https://doi.org/10.1587/transinf.2017EDP7420

Yang, G., Chen, Y., Zheng, X., & Hwang, G. (2020). From experiencing to expressing: A virtual reality approach to facilitating pupils’ descriptive paper writing performance and learning behavior engagement. British Journal of Educational Technology, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13056

Yee, O., Ha, J., &, & Ahn, Y. (2018). Experience of nursing students in problem-based learning (PBL) with pair discussion. Asia Life Sciences, 1, 567–576. https://shorturl.at/eARX6

Zainil, M., Kenedi, A. K., Rahmatina, Indrawati, T., & Handrianto, C. (2022). The Influence of a STEM-Based Digital Classroom Learning Model and High-Order Thinking Skills on the 21st-Century Skills of Elementary School Students in Indonesia. Journal of Education and E-Learning Research, 10(1), 29–35. https://doi.org/10.20448/jeelr.v10i1.4336

Zarouk, M. Y., Olivera, E., Peres, P., & Khaldi, M. (2020). The Impact of Flipped Project-Based Learning on Self-Regulation in Higher Education. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (IJET), 15(17), 127. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v15i17.14135.

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


View My Stats