Effectiveness of Project Based Learning Low Carbon STEM and Discovery Learning to Improve Creative Thinking Skills
(1) Science Education Program Universitas Sebelas Maret, Indonesia
(2) Science Education Program Universitas Sebelas Maret, Indonesia
(3) Science Education Program Universitas Sebelas Maret, Indonesia
Abstract
Integrating low-carbon or environmentally friendly principles into the learning process is possible, especially in the Project-Based Learning-Science Technological Engineering and Mathematics (PjBL-STEM) model. This study aims to determine the difference in effectiveness between PjBL-Low Carbon STEM and discovery learning to develop the creative thinking abilities of class IX students at one of Surakarta's public junior high schools and educate them about electricity and to know the application of the low carbon concept. This research is a quasi-experimental research type. The research design used in this study is the Pretest-Posttest Control Group Design, where the experimental class applies PjBL-Low Carbon STEM, and the control class applies discovery learning. The population in this study were all grade IX students. The sample in this study was class IX A as the experimental class and class IX B as the control class. The sampling technique used random cluster sampling. The data collection technique used a test of creative thinking skills description and student response questionnaires. The hypothesis test used is the t-test (t-test). This study concludes that there are differences in the effectiveness of PjBL-Low Carbon STEM and discovery learning to improve the creative thinking skills of class IX students on electrical materials. Applying the low carbon concept in the learning process can improve students' understanding of common carbon principles, concepts, and attitudes.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Akhmad, Y., Masrukhi, & Indiatmoko, B. (2020). The Effectiveness of the Integrated Project-Based Learning Model STEM to improve the Critical Thinking Skills of Elementary School Students. Educational Management, 9(1), 9–16. https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/eduman/article/view/35870
Amin, M. S., Permanasari, A., Setiabudi, A., & Hamidah, I. (2020). Level Literasi Low Carbon Siswa Sekolah Dasar dalam Aktivitas Kehidupan Sehari-Hari. Titian Ilmu: Jurnal Ilmiah Multi Sciences, 12(2), 49–57. https://doi.org/10.30599/jti.v12i2.653
Baran, M., Baran, M., Karakoyun, F., & Maskan, A. (2021). The Influence of Project-Based STEM (PjbL-STEM) Applications on the Development of 21st-Century Skills. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 18(4), 798–815. https://doi.org/10.36681/tused.2021.104
Bedir, H. (2019). Pre-service ELT teachers’ beliefs and perceptions on 21st century learning and innovation skills (4Cs). Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 14(4), 111–135.
Buntat, Y., Sharliana, N., Nasir, M., & Pendidikan, F. (2011). Faktor-Faktor Yang Mendorong Kreativiti Di Kalangan Pelajar, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia. Journal of Educational Psychology and Counseling, 2, 175–208.
Capraro, R. M., Capraro, M. M., & Morgan, J. R. (2013). STEM project-based learning an integrated science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) approach. In STEM Project-Based Learning an Integrated Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) Approach. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6209-143-6
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (Fifth Edit). SAGE Publications.
Ekawati, S., & Adirakasiwi, A. G. (2019). Analisis Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif Matematis dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Segiempat dan Segitiga. Prosiding Sesiomadika, 2(2), 405–414.
Erdem, A. R., & Adiguzel, D. C. (2019). The opinions of primary school teachers on their creative thinking skills. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 2019(80), 25–38.
Firdaus, H. M., Widodo, A., & Rochintaniawati, D. (2018). Analisis Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif dan Proses Pengembangan Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif Siswa SMP pada Pembelajaran Biologi. Assimilation: Indonesian Journal of Biology Education, 1(1), 21–28.
Gunamantha, I. M. (2010). Pendidikan Untuk Pembangunan Berkelanjutan : Mengapa, Apa dan Bagaimana. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pengajaran, 43(3), 215–221.
Handayani, S. ., Rahay, Y. ., & Agustini, R. (2021). Students ’ creative thinking skills in biology learning : fluency , flexibility , originality , and Students ’ creative thinking skills in biology learning : fluency , flexibility , originality , and elaboration. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1747. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1747/1/012040
Hasibuan, N. S., & Hufri. (2018). Pengaruh Bahan Ajar Fisika Berbasis Inkuiri Untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif Peserta Didik Pada Materi Momentum , Impuls Dan Getaran Harmonik Sederhana Kelas X Sman 8 Padang. Pillar of Physics Education, 11(3), 97–104.
Herak, R., & Lamanepa, G. H. (2019). Meningkatkan kreatifitas siswa melalui STEM dalam pembelajaran IPA. EduMatSains : Jurnal Pendidikan, Matematika Dan Sains, 4(1), 89–98. http://ejournal.uki.ac.id/index.php/edumatsains/article/view/1047
Heriyanto, H., Zaenuri, Z., & Walid, W. (2020). Analisis kemampuan berpikir kreatif siswa sekolah menegah pertama. PRISMA, Prosiding Seminar Nasional Matematika, 3, 587-590.
Insyasiska, D., Zubaidah, S., & Susilo, H. (2015). Pengaruh Project Based Learning Terhadap Motivasi Belajar , Kreativitas , Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis , dan Kemampuan Kognitif Siswa pada Pemebelajaran Biologi. Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi, 7(1), 9–21.
Jumi, W., Suleman, N., & Tangio, J. S. (2018). Identifikasi Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif Siswa Menggunakan Soal Tes Open Ended Problem Pada Materi Elektrokimia di SMA Negeri 1 Telaga. Jurnal Entropi, 13(1), 35–43.
Kristiani, K. D., Mayasari, T., & Kurniadi, E. (2017). Pengaruh pembelajaran STEM-PjBL terhadap keterampilan berpikir kreatif. Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Fisika III, 21.
Laboy-Rush, D. (2010). Integrated STEM Education through Project-Based Learning. Learning.com. https://www.rondout.k12.ny.us/common/pages/DisplayFile.aspx?itemId=16466975
Lestari, T. P., Sarwi, & Sumarti, S. S. (2018). STEM-Based Project Based Learning Model to Increase Science Process and Creative Thinking Skills of 5th Grade. Journal of Primary Education, 7(1), 18–24.
Lv, J. and Qin, S. (2016) On Low-Carbon Technology. Low Carbon Economy, 7, 107-115. doi: 10.4236/lce.2016.73010.
Mawarni, R., & Sani, R. A. (2020). Pengaruh Model Problem Based Learning Terhadap Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif Siswa pada Materi Pokok Fluida Statis Di Kelas XI SMA Negeri Tebing Tinggi T.P 2019/2020. Jurnal Inovasi Pembelajaran Fisika (INPAFI), 8(2), 8–15.
Mulhayatiah, D. (2015). Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Berbasis Proyek Untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif Mahasiswa. Edusains, 6(1), 17–22. https://doi.org/10.15408/es.v6i1.1096
Pauw, J. B., Gericke, N., Olsson, D., & Berglund, T. (2015). The Effectiveness of Education for Sustainable Development. Sustainability, 7, 15693–15717. https://doi.org/10.3390/su71115693
Permanasari, A., Hamidah, I., & Adriany, V. (2020). Low Carbon Education : Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, 438(Aes 2019), 164–166.
Piirto, J. (2011). Creativity for 21st Century Skills. Sense Publishers.
Ralph, R. A. (2011). Post Secondary Project-Based Learning in Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics. Journal of Technology and Science Education, 6(1), 26–35.
Sujana, I. W. C. (2019). Fungsi dan Tujuan Pendidikan Indonesia. ADI WIDYA: Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar, 4(1), 29–39.
Sukadi, E., & Sari, I. N. (2013). Miskonsepsi Mahasiswa Pendidikan Fisika STKIP PGRI Pontianak Pada Materi Listrik Statis. Jurnal Pendidikan Informatika Dan Sains, 2(2), 102–109.
Sumarni, W., Wijayati, N., & Supanti, S. (2019). Analysis Kemampuan Kognitif dan Berfikir Kreatif Siswa Melalui Pembelajaran Berbasis Proyek Berpendekatan STEM. Jurnal Pembelajaran Kimia OJS, 4(1), 18–30. http://dx.doi.org/10.17977/um026v4i12019p018
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
View My Stats