Scientific Argumentation Skills Through The Rasch Model on Analysis of Survey Data on The Importance of Aviation Vocational Education in Indonesia

Fitri Masito(1), I Gusti Agung Ayu Mas Oka(2), Catra Indra Cahyadi(3), Yeti Komalasari(4), Alfian Meidy Anes(5), Eko Risdianto(6),

DOI: https://doi.org/10.46843/jiecr.v3i3.178


(1) Politeknik Penerbangan Palembang, Indonesia
(2) Politeknik Penerbangan Palembang, Indonesia
(3) Politeknik Penerbangan Palembang, Indonesia
(4) Politeknik Penerbangan Palembang, Indonesia
(5) Politeknik Penerbangan Palembang, Indonesia
(6) Universitas Bengkulu, Indonesia

Abstract

This research aims to analyze the importance of scientific work skills in aviation vocational education in Indonesia using the Rasch Model. This research applies a mixed research methodology. The data collection tool in this study used reasoned test questions to uncover the argument skills of aviation vocational education cadets in Indonesia. The population taken in this study is aviation vocational education cadets in Indonesia. Sampling using purposive sampling techniques. The results of the analysis of reasoned question-answer analysis data entered with questionnaires are processed using the Winstep and Rasch Model applications. Analysis of cadet argumentation data is obtained at level 2 of 4 maximum levels. Argument skills at level 2 mean claiming with data. The results of deepening the scientific arguments of cadets obtained an alpha Cronbach value of 0.96 which belongs to a special category. The conclusion of Rasch model research applied to vocational education obtained cadet's argument skills on the plurality of claims with data.

Keywords

scientific argumentation skills, rash models, and vocational education

Full Text:

PDF

References

Archila, P.A., Molina, J. & Truscott de Mejía, AM. (2020). Using Historical Scientific Controversies to Promote Undergraduates’ Argumentation. Sci & Educ 29, 647–671. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-020-00126-6

Azwar, S. (2013). Sikap manusia dan pengukurannya. Yogyakarta. Pusat Belajar Offset.

Bond, T. G., & Fox, C. M. (2007). Applying the Rasch Model Fundamental Measurement in the Human Sciences, Second Edition (2nd Editio). Psychology Press.

Boone, W. J. (2016). Rasch Analysis for Instrument Development : Why, When, and How ? https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.16-04-0148

Castro, D. (2022). Argumentation in Suboptimal Settings. Argumentation, 1-22.

Febiyanti, H., Yuniar, D. C., & Utami, W. A. (2021). Peran Penting Pendidikan Karakter dalam Pendidikan Vokasi. 5, 7142–7148.

Forster, A. G., Bol, T., & van de Werfhorst, H. G. (2016). Vocational education and employment over the life cycle. Sociological Science, 3, 473–494. https://doi.org/10.15195/v3.a21

Frey, B. B., Ellis, J. D., Bulgren, J. A., Craig Hare, J., & Ault, M. (2015). Development of a Test of Scientific Argumentation. Electronic Journal of Science Education, 19(4), 1–18.

Hayati, S., Budi, A. S., & Handoko, E. (2015). Pengembangan Media Pembelajaran Flipbook Fisika untuk Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Peserta Didik. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Fisika (e-Jurnal) SNF2015, 4, 49–54.

Hinton, M. (2021). Corpus linguistics methods in the study of (meta) argumentation. Argumentation, 35(3), 435-455.

Linacre, J. M. (2011). A User's guide to WINSTEPS Ministers; Rasch- model Computer Program. In Program Manual 3.73.

Lytvyn, A., Lytvyn, V., Rudenko, L., Pelekh, Y., Dіdenko, O., Muszkieta, R., & Żukow, W. (2020). Informatization of technical vocational schools: Theoretical foundations and practical approaches. Education and Information Technologies, 25(1), 583-609.

Madjid, A. (2012). Pengenalan Keselamatan Penerbangan Di Lembaga Pendidikan. 2(3).

Martono, H. E., Rinaldi, R., Mubarok, A., Putra, R. H., Pieter, J., & Tirtanto, E. (2021). SKYHAWK : Jurnal Aviasi Indonesia Pendidikan Dasar Penerbang ( Pilot ) Dalam Lingkup Pendidikan Tinggi Vokasi. 1(1), 14–20.

Mouzakitis, G. S. (2010). The Role of Vocational Education and Training Curricula in Economic Development. (2nd ed., pp. 3914–3920). Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.03.616

Noroozi, O., Dehghanzadeh, H., & Talaee, E. (2020). A systematic review on the impacts of game-based learning on argumentation skills. Entertainment Computing, 35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.entcom.2020.100369

Ozer, M., & Perc, M. (2020). Dreams and realities of school tracking and vocational education. Palgrave Communications, 6(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-020-0409-4

Pandžić, S. (2022). Structured argumentation dynamics. Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence, 90(2), 297-337.

Perhubungan, K., & Manusia, B. P. S. D. (2020). Rencana Strategis Politeknik Penerbangan Surabaya Tahun 2020-2024 (Issue 031).

Ping, I. L. L., Halim, L., & Osman, K. (2020). Explicit teaching of scientific argumentation as an approach to developing argumentation skills, science process skills, and biology understanding. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 19(2), 276–288. https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/20.19.276

Ramadhan, M., Novinda, R., Studi, P., Fisika, P., Pendidikan, J., Dan, M., Keguruan, F., & Ilmu, D. A. N. (2019). Model Rasch Materi Gerak Lurus Kelas X Pontianak Artikel Penelitian.

Risdianto, E. (2019). Analisis Pendidikan Indonesia di Era Revolusi Industri 4 . 0 Disusun oleh : Yudi Prianto Subaidah Ziyadatur Rohmah Ferawati Firdaus. January, 0–16.

Risdianto, E., Darmawan, A., Kristiawan, M., Wachidi, & Riyanto. (2020). Rasch Model Analysis on The Feasibility Test Of Basic Physics Ii Practical Guide Using Augmented Reality. ARPN Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences, 15(4), 482–490. http://www.arpnjournals.org/jeas/research_papers/rp_2020/jeas_0220_8118.pdf

Suharti, & Faidin. (2021). Pengaruh Pengembangan Kurikulum Pendidikan Vokasi Bidang Keahlian Informatika Untuk Menghadapi Dunia Kerja. 01(April), 5–9.

Sultan, U., & Tirtayasa, A. (2019). Bagus-Aplikasi Rasch Model : Pengembangan Instrumen Tes Untuk Mengukur Miskonsepsi Mahasiswa. 2(1), 205–210.

Sumintono, B. (2014). Model Rasch untuk Penelitian Sosial Kuantitatif. Makalah Kuliah Umum Di Jurusan Statistika, ITS Surabaya, 21 November 2014, November 201, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1002/rcm.1134

Untary, H., Risdianto, E., & Kusen. (2020). Analisis Data Penelitian dengan Model Rasch dan Winstep. Halaman Moeka.

Vogel, F., Kollar, I., Ufer, S., Reichersdorfer, E., Reiss, K., & Fischer, F. (2016). Developing argumentation skills in mathematics through computer-supported collaborative learning: the role of transactivity. Instructional Science, 44(5), 477–500. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-016-9380-2

Wardina, U. V., Jalinus, N., & Asnur, L. (2019). Kurikulum Pendidikan Vokasi Pada Era Revolusi Industri 4.0. Jurnal Pendidikan, 20(1), 82. https://doi.org/10.33830/jp.v20i1.843.2019

Wibisono, S. (2016). Aplikasi Model Rasch Untuk Validasi Fundamentalisme Agama Bagi Responden Muslim. Jurnal Pengukuran Psikologi Dan Pendidikan Indonesia, 5(1), 729–750.

Winangun, K. (2017). Pendidikan Vokasi Sebagai Pondasi Bangsa Menghadapi Globalisasi. Taman Vokasi, 5(1), 72. https://doi.org/10.30738/jtvok.v5i1.1493

Witri, E., Ngatijo, N., & Haris Effendi-Hasibuan, M. (2020). Development of electronic student worksheets based on Toulmin argumentation patterns to improve argumentation skills in basic acid materials. Jurnal Pendidikan Kimia, 12(3), 116–123. https://doi.org/10.24114/jpkim.v12i3.21160

Ye, R. (2021). Rituals of Vocational Socialisation: Faith-Building in Higher Vocational Education for Weak-Form Occupational Pathways. Vocations and Learning 14, 353–368. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12186-021-09268-2

Zhu, M., Lee, H. S., Wang, T., Liu, O. L., Belur, V., & Pallant, A. (2017). Investigating the impact of automated feedback on students’ scientific argumentation. International Journal of Science Education, 39(12), 1648–1668. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2017.1347303

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


View My Stats