Teaching Model of Education Management through Google Classroom: The Trend of “The Kaizen Model”

Elihami Elihami(1), Ming Lin(2), Chang Biqing(3),

DOI: https://doi.org/10.46843/jiecr.v5i1.858


(1) Universitas Muhammadiyah Enrekang, Indonesia
(2) Philippines Woman University, Philippines
(3) Philippines Woman University, Philippines

Abstract

The incorporation of technology in education, notably through platforms like Google Classroom, has prompted significant changes in teaching methods. This includes adopting the Kaizen philosophy, which prioritizes continual improvement through small steps. This article examines how this philosophy intersects with Google Classroom, highlighting its importance. This research explained the trend of “The Kaizen Model” by using bibliometrics mapping. This study aims to analyze students’ perception of the technical, process, and evaluation learning of the Teaching Model of Education Management through Google Classroom.  The research method used qualitative research. The research method was a qualitative approach through VOS viewer. The object of the research was students of Philippine Women’s University who participated from various countries in the world. The instrument used questionnaires distributed via the website. The finding shows that students’ perceptions of technical indicators in the Kaizen Model learning are positive. Students’ perception of learning process indicators in the Kaizen model learning on average is positive. Students can understand the Kaizen model learning materials through discussions and communication between lecturers and students goes well. Students’ perception of evaluation indicators in the Kaizen Model learning on average are positive. The intense participation was well received by the students in the pilot courses, which allowed for improvements in areas like course ideas, course content, presentation style, and topic or detail selection. The study contributes to science for developing the concept of Kaizen through the education management department.

Keywords

Education, teachers, teaching, the Kaizen Model, Students, technology

Full Text:

PDF

References

Abdullah, M. A. (2006). Islamic studies di perguruan tinggi: Pendekatan integratif-interkonektif. Pustaka Pelajar.

Abebe, W. Y. (2013). Fostering academic genre knowledge of EFL learners throgh content and language integrated learning (CLIL). International Journal of Society, Culture & Language, 1(2), 133-144.

Abu-Rabia, S. (1997). Reading in Arabic orthography: The effect of vowels and context on reading accuracy of poor and skilled native Arabic readers. Reading and Writing, 9, 65–78.

Adugna, G. A. (2014). Challenges in the Implementation of Outcome Based Instruction in Cooperatives the Case of Ardaita Agricultural Technical Vocational Education and Training College [Doctoral dissertation, Addis Ababa University].

Akhmadeeva, L., Hindy, M., & Sparrey, C. J. (2013). Overcoming obstacles to implementing an outcome-based education model: Traditional versus transformational OBE. Proceedings of the Canadian Engineering Education Association (CEEA).

Akyol, Z., & Garrison, D. (2008). The Development of a Community of Inquiry over Time in an Online Course: Understanding the Progression and Integration of Social, Cognitive and Teaching Presence. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 12, 3–22.

Alavi, S. M., & Taghizadeh, M. (2013). Cognitive presence in a virtual learning community: An EFL Case. International Journal of E-Learning & Distance Education/Revue internationale du e-learning et la formation à distance, 27(1).

Al-Emran, M., Arpaci, I., & Salloum, S. (2020). An empirical examination of continuous intention to use m-learning: An integrated model. Education and Information Technologies, 25, 2899–2918.

Alghazi, S. S., Kamsin, A., Almaiah, M. A., Wong, S. Y., & Shuib, L. (2021). For sustainable application of mobile learning: An extended UTAUT model to examine the effect of technical factors on the usage of mobile devices as a learning tool. Sustainability, 13(4), 1856.

Almaiah, M. A., & Alismaiel, O. (2018). Examination of factors influencing the use of mobile learning system: An empirical study. Education and Information Technologies, 24, 885–909.

Almomen, R. K., Kaufman, D., Alotaibi, H., Al-Rowais, N. A., Albeik, M., & Albattal, S. M. (2016). Applying the ADDIE—analysis, design, development, implementation and evaluation—instructional design model to continuing professional development for primary care physicians in Saudi Arabia. International Journal of Clinical Medicine, 7(8), 538-546.

Alsharbi, B., Mubin, O., & Novoa, M. (2021). Quranic education and technology: Reinforcement learning system for non-native Arabic children. Procedia Computer Science, 184, 306–313.

Alsharbi, B., Mubin, O., & Novoa, M. (2021). Testing Phase of Reinforcement Learning System Designed for Quranic Education for Non-Native Arabic Children. Procedia Computer Science, 191, 160–167.

Ames, C. A. (1992). Classrooms: Goals, structures, and student motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 261–271.

Anzehaie, Z. H., & Bai, N. (2013). The role of information technology in successful knowledge management (Case study: Tehran’s physical education college). Pelagia Research Library Advances in Applied Science Research, 4(6), 197-200.

Arbaugh, J. (2008). Does the Community of Inquiry Framework Predict Outcomes in Online MBA Courses? The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 9, 1–21.

Arboledas, D. (2019). A new character-level encryption algorithm: How to implement cryptography in an ICT classroom. JOTSE: Journal of Technology and Science Education, 9(3), 257-268.

Ateh, C. M., & Ryan, L. B. (2023). Social Sciences & Humanities Open Preparing teacher candidates to be culturally responsive in classroom management. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 7(1), 100455–100455.

Balch, W. (2014). A Referential Communication Demonstration Versus a Lecture-Only Control. Teaching of Psychology, 41, 213–219.

Blumenthal, T., Cuthbert, B., Filion, D., Hackley, S., Lipp, O., & Boxtel, A. van. (2005). Committee report: Guidelines for human startle eyeblink electromyographic studies. Psychophysiology, 42(1), 1–15.

Bouton, M., Mineka, S., & Barlow, D. (2001). A modern learning theory perspective on the etiology of panic disorder. Psychological Review, 108(1), 4–32.

Dison, L., & Moore, J. (2019). Creating conditions for working collaboratively in discipline-based writing centres at a South African university. Per Linguam: a Journal of Language Learning, 35(1), 1-14.

Eck, N. J. van, & Waltman, L. (2009). Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 84, 523–538.

Fanselow, M. (1994). Neural organization of the defensive behavior system responsible for fear. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 1, 429–438.

Javier, P., Andoni, J., & Gonz, D. (2023). Satisfying students ’ psychological needs in the classroom: Benefits of an online intervention to help primary school teachers during a pandemic academic year. 133(August).

Joya, P., Panwar, R., Azhagiria, R., Krishnamurthy, A., & Adibatti, M. (2023). Flipped classroom: A student perspective of an innovative teaching method during the times of pandemic. Educación médica, 24(2), 1.

Kurniati. (2014). Peningkatan Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis dan Kreatif Matematis Serta Soft Skill Mahasiswa Pendidikan Guru Sekolah Dasar Melalui Pendekatan Pembelajaran Kontekstual [Doctoral Dessertation, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia].

Lang, P. J., Bradley, M. M., & Cuthbert, B. N. (2013). Motivated attention: Affect, activation, and action. Attention and orienting (pp. 97-135). Psychology Press.

Lang, P. J., Davis, M., & Öhman, A. (2000). Fear and anxiety: animal models and human cognitive psychophysiology. Journal of affective disorders, 61(3), 137-159.

Marone, V., & Heinsfeld, B. D. (2023). “Everyone pursuing their dreams”: Google's and Microsoft's discourse on educational technology. Computers and Education Open, 4, 100-138.

McCormick, D. (2008). Virtual Worlds Overview [PowerPoint slides]. Seoul National University. https://s-space.snu.ac.kr/bitstream/10371/95918/1/Virtual_Worlds_Overview.pdf

Mobbs, D., Petrovic, P., Marchant, J. L., Hassabis, D., Weiskopf, N., Seymour, B., Dolan, R., & Frith, C. (2007). When Fear Is Near: Threat Imminence Elicits Prefrontal-Periaqueductal Gray Shifts in Humans. Science, 317, 1079–1083.

Richter, J., Hamm, A., Pané-Farré, C., Gerlach, A., Gloster, A., Wittchen, H., Lang, T., Alpers, G., Helbig-Lang, S., Deckert, J., Fydrich, T., Fehm, L., Ströhle, A., Kircher, T., & Arolt, V. (2012). Dynamics of Defensive Reactivity in Patients with Panic Disorder and Agoraphobia: Implications for the Etiology of Panic Disorder. Biological Psychiatry, 72, 512–520.

Srirug, P., Jongjit, K., Muansri, O., Somton, Y., Kongbankhong, N., & Sengsoon, P. (2023). Prevalence and factor associated work-related musculoskeletal disorders of students in virtual classroom. Heliyon, 9(8).

Sujannah, W. D., Cahyono, B. Y., & Astuti, U. P. (2020). Effect of blended learning using Google Classroom on writing ability of EFL students across autonomy levels. Teaching English with Technology, 20(2), 82-97.

Yudintseva, A. (2023). Virtual reality affordances for oral communication in English as a second language classroom: A literature review. Computers & Education: X Reality, 2, 100018.

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


View My Stats