Ethnopedagogical Study of Local Wisdom Values as a Source of Learning for Forming Economic Behavior
(1) Universitas Swadaya Gunung Jati, Indonesia
(2) Universitas Swadaya Gunung Jati, Indonesia
(3) Lincoln University, Malaysia
Abstract
This study aims to determine the values of Cirebon Batik's local wisdom that can be used as an alternative source and material for developing economic behavior. This research was designed qualitatively, collecting data through interviews, observation, and document analysis. The research was conducted in Cirebon Regency. The batik craftsmen were key informants, boutique owners, batik leaders, employees, and local government, who became supporting informants in this study. The results show three aspects of economic behavior in the activities of batik craftsmen: economic morality, rationality, and altruism. The value of local wisdom that can be used to determine student behavior is the attitude of morality reflected in the attitude of honesty, discipline, commitment, and prioritizing the interests of others. Rationality is reflected in the attitude of wisdom, feeling sufficient in economic terms, and effective and efficient consideration in economic aspects, and altruism is reflected in the attitude of concern for others, sincere sharing, and empathy. This study finds that traditional Cirebon batik motifs are relevant to the value of five characteristics of education, including religion, nationalism, independence, mutual cooperation, and integrity. The values in Cirebon batik motifs can then be used as a learning resource for students, especially for developing character education based on cultural heritage. The academic contribution of this research can improve good economic behavior in the midst of eroding moral values and the love of the younger generation for local culture. The results of this study can be used as a reference for stakeholders in instilling and developing positive character, wise and able to preserve the prevailing local wisdom values.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Alwasilah, C. (2009). Etnopedagogi (Landasan Praktek Pendidikan Dan Pendidikan Guru). Kiblat.
Basri, M. (2019). Perilaku dan pembelajaran ekonomi rumah tanggamasyarakat Melayu dan Dayak di Kalimantan Barat [Dissertation, Universitas Negeri Malang].
Burhan, B. (2010). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. PT. Raja Grafindo Persada.
Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. Sage Publications, 3(3).
Damayanti, D., Widjaja, S. U. M., & Hermawan, A. (2020). Moralitas Ekonomi dalam Perspektif Budaya pada Mahasiswa. Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, Dan Pengembangan, 5(2), 153. http://dx.doi.org/10.17977/jptpp.v5i2.13159.
Demolingo, R. H., Damanik, D., Wiweka, K., & Adnyana, P. P. (2020). Sustainable Tourist Villages Management Based on Javanese Local Wisdom “Memayu Hayuning Bawono†Best Practice of Desa Wisata Pentingsari, Yogyakarta’. International Journal of Tourism & Hospitality Reviews, 7(2), 41-53.
Eriawaty, E. T. D., Widjaja, S. U. M., & Wahyono, H. (2022). Rationality, Morality, Lifestyle And Altruism In Local Wisdom Economic Activities Of Nyatu Sap Artisans. Journal of Positive School Psychology, 5781-5797.
Eggerman, M., & Panter-Brick, C. (2010). Suffering, hope, and entrapment: Resilience and cultural values in Afghanistan. Social Science and Medicine, 71(1), 71–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2010.03.023
Etzioni, A. (2010). Moral dimension: Toward a new economics. Simon and Schuster.
Fitriyanti, F., Faisal, E. L., Safitri, S., & Eriawaty, E. (2016). Development of instructional materials based local wisdom in social studies. Sriwijaya University Learning and Education International Conference, 2(1), 395-408.
Giannetti, M., & Simonov, A. (2004). On the determinants of entrepreneurial activity: Social norms, economic environment and individual characteristics. Swedish Economic Policy Review, 11(2), 269-313.
Handayani, L. (2018). Nilai-Nilai Ekonomi Dan Etika Bisnis Dalam Perspektif Islam. El-Iqtishod: Jurnal Ekonomi Syariah, 2(1), 14–25.
Husain, S. A. (2004). Max Weber’s Sociology of Islam: A Critique. Bangladesh E-Journal of Sociology, 1(1).
Kana‘iaupuni, S., Ledward, B., & Jensen, U. (2010). Culture-based education and its relationship to student outcomes. Kamehameha Schools Research and Evaluation, 12, 1–30.
Koentjaraningrat. (2002). Pengantar Ilmu Antropologi. PT Rineka Cipta.
Kusumawati, N., Rahmadyanti, E., & Sianita, M. M. (2021). Batik became two sides of blade for the sustainable development in Indonesia. Green Chemistry and Water Remediation: Research and Applications (pp. 59–97). Elsevier.
Lindsay, J. (2013). Cultural policy and the performing arts in Southeast Asia. Bijdragen Tot de Taal-, Land- En Volkenkunde/Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences of Southeast Asia, 151(4), 656–671.
Logayah, D. (2021). Nilai-nilai Kearifan Lokal dalam Melestarikan Lingkungan Hidup di Desa Adat Cireunde. Jurnal Internasional Pedagogi Ilmu Sosial, 6(2), 53–64.
Miranti, A., Lilik, L., Winarni, R., & Surya, A. (2021). Representasi Pendidikan Karakter Berbassis Kearifan Lokal dalam Motif Batik Wahyu Ngawiyatan sebagai Muatan Pendidikan Senirupa di Sekolah Dasar. Jurnal Basicedu, 5(2), 546–560. https://doi.org/10.31004/basicedu.v5i2.763
Nadjib, M. (2013). Agama, Etika dan Etos Kerja dalam Aktivitas Ekonomi Masyarakat Nelayan Jawa. Jurnal Ekonomi dan Pembangunan, 21(2), 137-150.
Prawiyogi, A. G., Dwimarwati, R., Afryanto, S., DS, Y. N., & Asmara, A. S. (2023). Bloom's Taxonomy Theory in the Pedagogical Value of Domyak Art: An Ethnopedagogical Perspective. Journal of Innovation in Educational and Cultural Research, 4(2), 311-318.
Setiadi, E. M. (2020). Pengantar Ringkas Sosiologi: Pemahaman Fakta dan Gejala Permasalahan Sosial. Prenada Media.
Sudarman, S. (2014). Fenomenologi Husserl Sebagai Metode Filsafat Eksistensial. Al-Adyan: Jurnal Studi Lintas Agama, 9(2), 103-113.
Sugiyono. (2014). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Alfabeta.
Sugiyono, P. D. (2020). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif Untuk Penelitian Yang Bersifat: Eksploiratif, Enterpretif Dan Konstruktif. ALFABETA.
Sularso, S. (2015). Revitalisasi kearifan lokal dalam pendidikan dasar. Jurnal Pendidikan Sekolah Dasar Ahmad Dahlan, 2(1), 73-80.
Usop, T. B. (2011). Kearifan Lokal Dalam Arsitektur Kalimantan Tengah Yang Berkesinambungan. Jurnal Perspektif Arsitektur, 6(1), 25–32.
Utari, U., Degeng, I. N. S., & Akbar, S. (2016). Pembelajaran Tematik Berbasis Kearifan Lokal Di Sekolah Dasar Dalam Menghadapi Masyarakat Ekonomi Asean (MEA). Jurnal Teori Dan Praksis Pembelajaran IPS, 1(1), 39–44. https://doi.org/10.17977/um022v1i12016p039
Widagdo, J., Ismail, A. I., & Alwi, A. B. (2021). Study of the Function, Meaning, and Shape of Indonesian Batik From Time To Time. In ICON ARCCADE 2021: The 2nd International Conference on Art, Craft, Culture and Design (ICON-ARCCADE 2021), 1-7. Atlantis Press. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.211228.001
Wigunadika, I. W. S. (2018). Pendidikan karakter berbasis kearifan lokal masyarakat bali. Purwadita: Jurnal Agama Dan Budaya, 2(2), 91-100.
Wulandari, A. (2011). Batik Nusantara-Makna Filosofis, Cara Pembuatan, Dan Industri Batik. Andi Publisher.
Yunus, U., & Tulasi, D. (2012). Batik Semiotics as a Media of Communication in Java. Cultura. International Journal of Philosophy of Culture and Axiology, 9(2), 143−150.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
View My Stats